• Home
  • Blog
  • How Are Committee Chairs Selected In The House? Top Full Guide 2021

How Are Committee Chairs Selected In The House? Top Full Guide 2021

Elected and appointed positions for members of congress depend on the position and circumstances of the individual. Committee chairs, however, are assigned by the majority leader based on the current political climate and the agenda of the party in power.

Let’s be with Focal Upright to learn more about How are committee chairs selected in the House?

Committee History

The original purpose of the U.S. House of Representatives committee system was to allow temporary discussion of legislation for the Committee of the Whole. This device allows all members to be considered one large committee. The committee system grew and developed with the growth of the federal government. Many select committees that had been formed previously to discuss a particular item were disbanded and became standing committees. The committee system was streamlined after this period of growth and restructured with Legislative Reorganization Acts 1946 And 1970. This also led to an increase in the number of professional staff and subcommittees.

Committee chairs were traditionally chosen by seniority. This means that the longest-serving members of the committee from the majority and minority parties become the chairperson and ranking member of the committee.

Please refer to

Different Types Of House Committees

The Senate has three types of committees. These include standing, special, and joint committees.

Standing Committees

Standing committees are permanent committees whose jurisdiction is identified in the House Rules. The House currently has 20 standing committees and one permanent select committee.

Select and special committees

Select committees are created by a resolution to conduct investigations or consider measures, usually on a specific topic, and are not renewed on a permanent basis.

Joint Committees

Joint committees, such as the Joint Committee on Taxation, have both House and Senate members and typically conduct studies rather than consider measures.

Note: House leaders determine the size of each committee at the start of each Congress. They set the number and size of subcommittees and committees as well as the ratio of majority to minority members on each panel.

Different Types Of House Committees

How Are Committee Chairs Selected In The House?

The chair of a committee is the head of a committee. The committee chair determines the agenda of the committee and decides when or in how many states bills will be considered. The chair of a committee has the following responsibilities:

  • To call the committee together in order to fulfill its duties.
  • President and control of meetings.
  • All questions concerning order are subject to appeal.
  • Supervising and supervising the members of the committee.
  • Supervising or preparing reports for the committee to submit to the body.

As soon as possible, take custody of any papers referred to the Committee and send them to the Clerk of the Chamber if necessary.

The committees play a crucial role in the legislative process. Because of this, the “appointing authority” carefully considers the selections for committee leadership. But who is the appointing power?

It is most often the presiding officer of an assembly. The president of the Senate and the speaker of Congress appoint committee chairs in 63 of 99 of the nation’s legislative chambers.

Sometimes another legislative leader, such as the speaker pro tem, president pro tem, or majority leader, selects the committee chairs. This happens in 16 chambers.

Standing committee chairs in 13 chambers are appointed by a committee, such as a committee of committees, rules or management committee.

Membership In A Committee


The assignment of committees in the Senate follows the party rules and practices. The majority of new senators arrive at the Senate with a “wishlist” of possible committee assignments. They realize that their legislative effectiveness can be enhanced by being appointed to committees that have a particular impact on their state and region’s interests. Senate party leaders see the appointment process as a way to promote party discipline by granting or withholding desired assignments.

The Senate appointed committee members by either a vote of the entire body or by decision of its presidency up until the middle of the 19th century. The first was inordinately slow and time-consuming. The second caused controversy and dissatisfaction.

In 1846, senators agreed to a process in which all political parties would submit to the Senate for approval a list of members to fill various committee seats. This plan encouraged the development of the Senate party conference (Democrats use the informal term “democratic caucus”) Members of third parties and independents have been assigned to committees through one of the major party conferences.

Party conferences are held before each new Congress begins to elect leaders and assign committee members. This has been the norm in recent years. Each party conference creates a “committee of committees” to compile a list of people it wants to be named to its specific allotted seats in the committees. The party’s percentage in the Senate determines how many seats it will get on each committee. However, exact numbers can be negotiated between the party floor leaders.

According to party conference rules, each senator can choose a committee assignment before any other member. The priority system gives the first choice to senators who have served previously in the Senate, followed by those who have served in the House and then those who were governors of their state. The order of the other new members is determined by a random draw.

Seniority and Selection of Chairmen

The chairman of a committee is traditionally the most senior member of a majority party. The Republican Party won the majority in 1995 and changed its conference rules to allow Republicans to vote secretly for the chairman of their respective committees. This was due to the larger party’s decision to limit the term of service for its chairmen and, if in the minority, its ranking member to six years.


The three categories that are most important to Senate committees are Class A, B, and C. Senate rule XXIV states that members and chairmen of committees must be appointed by a Senate Resolution, except where otherwise directed. These are the limitations of assignment in the rules:

A, B, and C’s. Each senator can serve on one or two Class A panels and no more than two class A committees. Service on Class C panels is unlimited.

Class A subcommittees. Members who are not full chairmen of their assigned Class-A committees may serve on three subcommittees. However, they can only be eligible to chair or serve as a ranking minority member of one of those subcommittees. This limitation is not applicable to Appropriations subcommittee assignments. Full committee chairmen may only chair one subcommittee of the entire committee.

Class B subcommittees. Senators can also serve on subcommittees of their Class B committees. There is no limit on the number of members who can serve on Class C committees. A chairman of a full Class B committee cannot chair any subcommittee of the panel but can serve as a non-voting member on any subcommittee.

“Super-A” committees. Republican Conference rules limit party members to serve on only one of the so-called “Super A” committees–Appropriations, Armed Services, Finance, and Foreign Relations. Democrats observe the same practice for three committees–Appropriations, Armed Services, and Finance.

Same-state rule. According to both party conferences, if two senators from the same party are in a state, they may not be able to serve on the same committee.

Exceptions. A standing committee can temporarily increase its membership by entering into an agreement with the majority and minority leaders. Rule 25.4c states that “. . . Temporarily, one or more members of one or several standing committees can be increased by such numbers or other numbers as are necessary to give the majority party a majority in all standing committees. If a temporary increase in membership is required to give the majority party a majority in all standing committees, then members of the majority party may serve as members in the three standing committees described in paragraph 2.

After the temporary increase is over, no such temporary increase in membership of any standing committee under this subparagraph may be continued in force. “This subparagraph does not allow for any standing committee to be expanded in its membership by more than the two members prescribed by paragraph 2 or 3.a.


Because of the vital role that committees play in the legislative process, their chairmen have great power. In the 19th century, and for the first half of the 20th, major committee chairmen used their power arbitrarily and capriciously to frustrate their adversaries. The Senate attempted to democratically reform committee procedures in 1946 and again in 1970. These reforms included but weren’t limited to:

1. Establishment of weekly, biweekly, or monthly meetings;

2. Provision for special meetings, with or without chairman’s approval

3. Authorization for minorities to choose and call witnesses

4. Advance public announcement of hearings; advance filing of witness testimony.

5. Unless closed by a majority of the Senate’s committees, public access to hearings and meetings, including television and radio coverage, is allowed.

6. Access to the records of votes and proceedings of committees; formal report on committee activities during the previous Congress.

7. Reporting a fully documented resolution authorizing expenditures by the committee within a reasonable time frame.

Except for Appropriations and Budget, committees are not permitted to meet more than two hours after the Senate’s regular convening time and not past two o’clock in the afternoon without the permission of either party floor leaders or their designees.


In its early years, in response to new requirements or to accommodate individual members who wanted the office space and staff that went directly to chairs, the Senate added new committees to existing panels. The result was a lot of committees. Most of them didn’t meet or deal with any legislation.

In the early 20th century, nearly as many committees existed as senators. Occasionally, there were consolidations in the number of and jurisdictions of Senate Committees. However, this was quickly replaced by renewed expansion. This was changed by the 1946 Legislative Reorganization Act. The number of full committees fluctuated between 15 to 20 over the years.

Between 1947 and 1977, the pressure to expand was diverted from full committees towards subcommittees. Subcommittees grew naturally as a result of the increasing number of postwar policy issues that demanded attention within a tightly consolidated committee structure. Until reforms of the 1970s curtailed the practice, some committees–such as Judiciary–maintained as many as 15 subcommittees, with the full committee’s chairman presiding over several of them. The Senate does not currently limit the number of subcommittees that can be assigned to each legislative committee.

However, it allows for as many as seven. The Appropriations Committee has 13 subcommittees. The Membership section explains that a full committee chairman can now be a non-voting member of any of the subcommittees of the panel. Each full committee chairman can only preside over one class A subcommittee from all the full committees to whom he or she has been assigned. This reform allows senators to have the option to chair subcommittees or serve as ranking minority party members, including junior members

Read more